User talk:Nethilia

Previous discussion on my talk page can be seen here: Nethilia Talk Archive. Please check here before asking a question--it may have already been asked.

Don't ask me questions that don't have anything to do with information such as personal questions or the like. I keep my work here somewhat separate from any AG Fandom involvement for a myriad of reasons. If you would like to talk to me fandom wise, please contact me AWAY from the A*G Wiki.

Also, do not use my page to bitch about any other admins. Be A Big Girl. Chances are, if you're getting fussed at, there's a good damn reason for it.

Help!!!
I keep leaving edits and AkaiKaze keeps deleting them,and all of the edits I make are all true!Please help me!I don't feel welcomed on here. --This unsigned comment was made by IP Address 173.60.78.170 on 21:55, 10 October 2010.


 * First of all, sign my page. Second of all, if your edits keep getting deleted, go see why they are being deleted. Don't go running to one admin tattling on another. This isn't second grade. Nethilia 06:05, October 11, 2010 (UTC)

I KNOW
Ok,first of all AkaiKaze doesn't tell me why she deleted them.She just DELETES!!!!!And I know this isn't second grade!!!!!!--This unsigned comment was made by IP Address 74.100.74.56 on 13:31, 11 October 2010.


 * 1) Sign your comments.


 * 2) Be A Big Girl.


 * 3) When something is removed or deleted or there is generally a comment as to why.


 * 20:55, October 11, 2010 (UTC)Nethilia

O.K....I get it now,but I don't wanna be treated like I'm 5!!!!Thanks for the tip.74.100.74.56 21:00, October 11, 2010 (UTC)

@User:Nethila ,

You should'nt make strict rules for your wiki "clique".

Why???
Why did you delete my edit on Molly McIntire?74.100.73.23 04:03, October 13, 2010 (UTC)


 * I typed it out on the other admin's Talk Page. Go read it. --Nethilia 04:05, October 13, 2010 (UTC)

Ok....sorry about that!Ok I went to read it and I saw it,did you also type it about Chrissa and Samantha cause you deleted those too.74.100.73.23 04:11, October 13, 2010 (UTC)

Nooooo!!!!!
YOU DELETED EVERYTHING THAT I EDITED!!!!!!74.100.73.23 04:13, October 13, 2010 (UTC)


 * This was unnecessary and immature. Take two weeks to cool your nerves. --Nethilia 05:25, October 13, 2010 (UTC)

Thats not necessary
Thats not necessary,I don't need to take 2 weeks OFF!!!!!Can you just please stop getting mad at me for nothing. Thank you!74.111.206.155 23:24, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * Stop acting like a child, and Nethilia and I will stop treating you like a child. Learn to read the rules, and learn to read what's acceptable and unacceptable for this wiki. Until then, take a three-month timeout. --AkaiKaze 01:32, October 14, 2010 (UTC)

Thank You very much!
Thank You very much guys for unblocking me,although I don't see why I was blocked!But anyways to stay out of trouble(like getting blocked)I might just go find another wiki to edit.And I hope that their not so strict.I apologize for all the inconvenience I have brought to this wiki.I left a sorry note on AkaiKaze' talk page a couple days ago before I got blocked and I guess no one saw it.Anyways if you guys don't mind I'm gonna say something...ok,I just wanted to let you guys know that if you guys keep being so strict to people pretty soon no ones gonna wanna come on here anymore,and I'm not trying to sound like your momma or something I'm just trying to keep you guys away from that.Once again I am sorry for my additude lately,and Thank You for unblocking!71.254.157.27 17:59, October 14, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah they are pretty strict about editing! Good thing I never edit on here, otherwise I would be getting yelled at. --This unsigned comment was made by IP Address 75.69.5.232 at 09:04, 16 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I fail to see what this has to do with anything. --Nethilia 11:08, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

Yup!!
Yeah,I know....way too strict.Hey Nethilia,it has everything to do about it.I'm saying thank you for unblocking me.Anyways where are the rules for this wiki,I can't find it!71.165.78.70 17:29, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * The link to the rules can be found on the front page of this wiki. Or here. I strongly suggest you read that before you start making any edits to any existing pages, and if you feel you cannot abide by the rules for whatever reasons, then perhaps editing for this wiki is not meant for you. --AkaiKaze 17:57, October 17, 2010 (UTC)


 * My page is not for your conversations or your useless thank yous. I don't care. Since you seem to not understand much about rules or how to edit on a wiki, take time to read the rules or consider yourself removed. You haven't been unblocked, by and by. You have a rotating IP address. --Nethilia 20:38, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

You know,all I said was "Thank You," and here you are getting mad at me and then ending up blocking me!I'm not getting mad or anything,I'm just letting YOU know why you blocked me.You can get mad at me and block me,but I don't really care.I read the rules and I seem to understand it.Some aren't very needed in the rules.I just wanted to let you know.I beg you not to block me because I won't be editing on here for a while.Thank you and this time I hope that you don't block me just for saying "Thank you!"74.100.160.116 02:34, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

Oasis skin redesign
I know this has nothing to do with AG, but it does concern the wiki.

Wikia has plans to remove the Monaco skin and replace it with a new skin named Oasis by November 3 -- as far as I'm aware Monobook will still be available. I'm not sure if you've seen the new look when it debuted on October 6 (you may have to log out to see the Oasis look), but I reverted it back to Monaco as soon as I saw it. General consensus on Wikia's general forum and blogs regarding Oasis has been less than enthusiastic, to put things mildly.

I'd play with the Oasis look and see how to best adjust it for this wiki, but I thought you should be the one to set the standards. Wikia's put up a transition guide, but it has not been updated since September 27. --AkaiKaze 18:27, October 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'll play with it, and see what can be done. I didn't design the current layout, but I'm sure we can work in the new layout for the most part. Nethilia 21:37, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Victorian?
You deleted a point I made about Samantha Parkington's time and how her books were talking about Victorian America rather than the Victorian Era. Why did you do this?

P.S. Wiki Victorian America. It was an actual time. --This unsigned comment was made by IP Address 24.70.171.4 on 21:00, November 6, 2010


 * The Victorian era was an actual time, yes. It was also named after Queen Victoria, who died in 1901. Sam's books start in 1904. She's Edwardian.


 * Google. It's your friend. --Nethilia 05:13, November 9, 2010 (UTC)

~Sorry to disturb you. I'm new, so I'm not quite sure how things work. Nethalia (Hi by the way :D) Victorian America was more of an off-shoot to the real Victorian Era. America wasn't ruled by Queen Victoria because they had a president. I don't want to sound rude, but I do agree with this person when I say Google up Victorian America. You'll see for youself that it's different in a way. Again I'm SO sorry if I'm being rude D: If you must punish me, I understand-- Jenny_006


 * The attitudes demonstrated by Samantha's books and the turn of the Century in the US are clearly closer to Edwardian with notions of progress and moving class lines. While not directly ruled by a queen (Really, have you checked my age? Like I don't know the US was run by a president?) to call the era Victorian is more wrong than calling it Edwardian. I've not only Googled it, I've studied it in college. --Nethilia 05:50, November 9, 2010 (UTC)

~Still, technically in America she was considered a Victorian. Edwardians were more British than Americans, and I doubt AG is in-accurate when it comes to Samantha. This was probably (can be wrong) the last time England has influenced America since the Colonial days. But potato tomato-- Jenny_006

~ One last thing: Also consider Samantha's time. Her time begins at 1904, yet Victorian America ended in 1910. This can be why she's technically some kind of Victorian. The attitudes can be Edwardian, but the real time in America there was Victorian, which was why Samantha was created with a Victorian style. Just another thing--- Jenny_006


 * AG has been wrong on a number of things. --Nethilia 08:25, November 9, 2010 (UTC)

~ Yes they are. But I'm afraid you're quite wrong here. Just because England had a Victorian Era doesn't mean the whole WORLD was Victorian as well. I found this on wiki:

"While the Victorian Era is a name for the period from 1837 to 1901 in the United Kingdom, American Victorianism was an offshoot of this period and lifestyle that occurred in the United States, chiefly in heavily populated regions such as New England and the Deep South from roughly 1875 to 1910 after the Civil War. The name was derived from the reign of Queen Victoria, which reflected the heavy British cultural influence on the nation during the time. As American business people of the Second Industrial Revolution created sprawling industrial towns and cities in the Northeast, the growing upper class of the Gilded Age mimicked the high society of their former mother country in dress, morality, and mannerisms. The period included various activities—the Second Industrial Revolution, the Women's suffrage movement, and Republican political domination"

As you can see/read, these two era are similar but were not the SAME THING. I'm not in college yet, but even I know the difference with these two Victorian times.Jenny_006

P.S. Sorry if I enraged you in anyway.
 * I am not sure what Nethilia's views on Wikipedia are, but my view is that one should not cite Wikipedia in one's research because Wikipedia itself can be inaccurate as well. It is a wiki, which means people can come in and edit/vandalize as they please, and wikis are only as good as the people who work on them. I believe if a non-Wikipedia link can be used as a reference, it should be used in lieu of links to Wikipedia - Wikipedia links in the AG wiki's articles are meant to be general sources to people who may be unfamiliar either with terminology or items used in the stories and among AG's products.


 * As to whether or not Samantha's time period is Victorian/Edwardian, bear in mind there has always been an overlap between eras. However, as pointed out, the general attitudes, fashions, and social issues of the 1900s points Samantha's time more as Edwardian than Victorian. It can only be presumed that AG refers to Samantha's time period as Victorian for marketing purposes rather than historical accuracy. --AkaiKaze 07:15, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * ~This has GOT to stop 0_o Yes I'm not a member, but even I know how wrong  '  you guys are. For one thing, this is American Girl. American. This is about AMERICAN history, so why bring England in this? Edwardians have no connection with Victorian America. Edwardians were subjects of King Edward. So HOW ON EARTH does America get into this? WHY are Americans Edwardian? They're not. Victorian America, as quoted by the other girl, was a knock-off of England's Victoria and Edwardian era. Yes they overlap, but they are in different countries . As for "the turn of the century", that was just the 1890s and 1900s. The overall time was VICTORIAN AMERICA.
 * I don't care how much you "studied" this; if you acutally think Americans were ever Edwardians, then you were NOT paying attention! Whoever the other girl knows what she's talking about. My advice: Go Goggle this timew period yourself, or get a book, and then TELL ME what it says. AG knows what they're talking about when it comes to history. I would also like to know how AMERICANS suddenly became EDWARDIANS. (Your over-lapping history excuse doesn't work) Tell me soem proof, and then we'll talk.142.32.208.228 21:31, November 22, 2010 (UTC)A history buff/child of a history teacher.
 * I don't care how much you "studied" this; if you acutally think Americans were ever Edwardians, then you were NOT paying attention! Whoever the other girl knows what she's talking about. My advice: Go Goggle this timew period yourself, or get a book, and then TELL ME what it says. AG knows what they're talking about when it comes to history. I would also like to know how AMERICANS suddenly became EDWARDIANS. (Your over-lapping history excuse doesn't work) Tell me soem proof, and then we'll talk.142.32.208.228 21:31, November 22, 2010 (UTC)A history buff/child of a history teacher.
 * I don't care how much you "studied" this; if you acutally think Americans were ever Edwardians, then you were NOT paying attention! Whoever the other girl knows what she's talking about. My advice: Go Goggle this timew period yourself, or get a book, and then TELL ME what it says. AG knows what they're talking about when it comes to history. I would also like to know how AMERICANS suddenly became EDWARDIANS. (Your over-lapping history excuse doesn't work) Tell me soem proof, and then we'll talk.142.32.208.228 21:31, November 22, 2010 (UTC)A history buff/child of a history teacher.


 * If you are quite done irritating me about facts and being an utter brat and claiming that being born of a teacher makes you know anything, I'll be ignoring you. --Nethilia 09:40, November 26, 2010 (UTC)

I'd like to cut in on this history debate. Pleasant Rowland at a fan signing explained that the era is not Victorian, however, Samantha lived a Victorian life because she lived an old-fashioned life living with her Grandmary. Styles just don't come and go that easily. Even though the Victorian Age technically ended in 1901, that doesn't mean it just came and POP! no one has any results of it anymore. It takes time for styles to change, especially in homes run by older people, and in the country, which was where Samantha lived (as there were no such things as suburbs until the 1940s) and so styles traveled much slower to the country than in the city. It was just three years prior to the book time that the Victorian Age ended, so I doubt Grandmary would've changed her ways in those three years or anyone else in the country. In the city, yes, in the country, not as fast. She is considered a Victorian beauty because she was raised to be that way. But the Edwardian IDEAS were BEGINNING to take over, thus showing in Cornelia's newer attitude. It's the conflict of the times shifting from one style of progress to another. America was in awe of England and it's styles so America imitated. Simply put they were styles that traveled to America, and eventually spread through America, thanks to better steam ship travel. It's not that Americans are Edwardians, it's the era because they imitated the styles of English people living under the Victorians, and later imitating the ideas of the Edwardians, but very briefly. It's a play on the name. I am a history teacher, and history is a controversial subject. It's best to get your information from the author and why she chose to make the story the way she did rather than rabble through many books who all contradict each other anyway. We never imitated an Edwardian era, we only imitated the Victorian Era. When the Edwardians came in the power, the Victorian Era as a style was thriving but withering. Edwardian didn't exist in America. We simply adopted the ideas, not caring who was in power in England --Soratothamax 21:26, January 12, 2011 (UTC)Soratothamax

Hello again!
Hello Nethilia,I'm sure you remember me by my signature.Anyways,I was wondering if I could edit some things about the Historical American Girl doll Felicity Merriman?71.189.49.48 00:58, November 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * Hmm? --Nethilia 05:14, November 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Is that a yes?173.60.222.101 15:23, November 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello Nethilia, I was created account like you asked me after I edit Samantha's page. I'll be glad to share my knowledge about AG items as I am collecting Pleasant Co and Ag items from 1986 . Thank you for inviting me to your blog
 * Hello Nethilia, I was created account like you asked me after I edit Samantha's page. I'll be glad to share my knowledge about AG items as I am collecting Pleasant Co and Ag items from 1986 . Thank you for inviting me to your blog
 * Hello Nethilia, I was created account like you asked me after I edit Samantha's page. I'll be glad to share my knowledge about AG items as I am collecting Pleasant Co and Ag items from 1986 . Thank you for inviting me to your blog

Did you?!
Ok,I just wanna know if you deleted my edit on Chrissa's page?I ust wanna know a yes or a no,and that will solve it.71.254.157.149 19:22, November 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, do I know you? --Nethilia 05:14, November 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ummm,I don't think so,but did you delete it.I'm not blaming you I just want to know.
 * Ummm,I don't think so,but did you delete it.I'm not blaming you I just want to know.

Heads up: Confirmation of a New Historical on the way
http://www.americangirl.com/cruise/

On the official American Girl cruise website, look to the right. Press "the American Girl cruise events". There is an event called "New Historical Character Event". Just a heads-up and confirmation that it's not just a rumor anymore that there will be a new historical character. She will more than likely have a six-book series as they mention it in the events. She seems to be due out at least by November, if not much sooner.

Also, there is a revamp in American Girl mini dolls in American Girl catalog. Samantha and Felicity have already been confirmed as being released in their holiday outfits. Samantha in January and Felicity in February. It was in the latest catalog.

--Soratothamax 04:58, January 2, 2011 (UTC)Soratothamax


 * Knew the second--it is limited for the year. As for the first, until this is confirmed in a press release by AG, there's nothing doing about it, really. --Nethilia 05:55, January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Emails
How do you stop getting these emails and messages. Things keep popping up saying "You have a new message on American Girl Wikia". I even get emails. I don't want them because I didn't write the things, my sister keeps getting on my account. It won't let me take things off the list of contributions. Cedricdoodlehopper 19:41, January 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't know how your e-mail works. You will need to figure this out yourself. --Nethilia 02:21, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

Article Deleted, No Comment Left
Recently, my article on InnerStarU was deleted. When I viewed the article, there was no comment stating on why it was deleted. I also viewed the Article Policy page, and I could not figure out why you would have deleted my article. Please tell me what I did wrong so I can fix it. Thanks!AGmhfnmjel9 22:50, January 20, 2011 (UTC)AGmhfnmjel9 22:47, January 20, 2011 (UTC)AGmhfnmjel9


 * Please see the rule about blog posts on the front page. --Nethilia 04:32, January 21, 2011 (UTC)

Defaultsort template?
Do you think the book articles could benefit from a DEFAULTSORT template? The DEFAULTSORT template would only affect book articles that start with "A", "An", "The", and the like with proper categorizing - as an example, if the DEFAULTSORT template was applied to The Puzzle of the Paper Daughter, that book article would appear under P in the Category:Books listing, rather than T.

This would be a wiki-wide effect - taking the The Puzzle of the Paper Daughter example again, if I looked in the Julie Albright category, the book would still be listed under P, rather than T. I think it could greatly organize all the book articles.

Here's a example source code for the DEFAULTSORT template as seen in the DC wiki: http://dc.wikia.com/index.php?title=Template:DEFAULTSORT&action=edit but a more simpler form of the template could be used in the book articles, like

""

(blockquoted for better clarification)

The template would go to the bottom of the article and otherwise will not show in the article proper itself. --AkaiKaze 01:52, February 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * That would be excellent! Please implement it when you have the time. I'm the worst coder ever. --Nethilia 08:30, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * And it'll be best for people and/or characters, too. Like, for instance, the Merriman family members would be listed under M instead of using their first names as a basis. Blakegripling ph 02:29, May 9, 2011 (UTC)

Polly Merriman's Birthday
It does not mention in Felicity's New Sister what day Polly is born but in Polly's bio (under the illustrations at the front of the main books) It says she is born in December of 1775.

Hi
Thanks for unblocking me. Is it okay if I edit your wiki(as long as the information is true) Anna 02:00, February 21, 2011 (UTC) AMKURK

Editing Problems on Firefox
I have been trying to edit some articles from Firefox, but recently I can't edit. The publish button is greyed out, so if I click it nothing happens. is this because of the wiki, or is it my internet? (I'm on Internet Explorer right now. I don't go here anymore because of serious lag.)

Jenny 006 02:18, March 19, 2011 (UTC)Jenny_006 :D

Marie Grace and Cecile
Here are photos of Marie Grace and Cecile:

http://s71.photobucket.com/albums/i129/calyndra7/AG%20Publication%20Catalog%20May%202011/

Now that we know who they are, may I make the "Meet Cecile" and 'Meet Marie Grace" pages? (And perhaps their main pages)

Jenny 006 19:57, May 8, 2011 (UTC)Jenny_006


 * Until we know what their last names are (at minimum, Nethilia may disagree with me on this), I believe it's policy that no pages for the new Historicals are to be created. Rebecca's pages and articles were not created until her official release in May 2009. --AkaiKaze 20:02, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ahhhh, I see. Well apparently, they're full names are "Cecile Rey" and "Marie-Grace Gardner." (Just found them) Jenny 006 21:12, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ahhhh, I see. Well apparently, they're full names are "Cecile Rey" and "Marie-Grace Gardner." (Just found them) Jenny 006 21:12, May 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * There is not information for a full article. I will write data about this on the main page, but until there are clearer pictures and officially released images from American Girl--a press release--do not create an article regarding them. Thanks. --Nethilia 01:20, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * I found book covers and summaries!:
 * http://ag-over-18.livejournal.com/954879.html
 * Jenny 006 04:50, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * http://ag-over-18.livejournal.com/954879.html
 * Jenny 006 04:50, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Jenny 006 04:50, May 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * I mod that community. There is not enough information at the present. --Nethilia 05:31, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Recent doll retirements
It's come to my attention that two dolls have recently been retired (Just Like You 4 and the blonde-haired, grey-eyed Bitty Baby). Considering JLY 4 had a unique mold and now that it's retired, should something be mentioned in either the Face Mold or Asian Mold articles?

Additionally, I've been thinking of converting the Options Available gallery into a visual gallery akin to the one for the My AG dolls, especially since there are now altogether 8 Bitty Babies (3 new dolls, 4 current dolls, and 1 retired doll).

ETA: Just to give an idea, I've made a mockup of a Bitty Baby visual gallery in the sandbox to show the addition of the new Bitty Babies. --AkaiKaze 08:47, June 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * I would certainly mention it on the face mold article, and the layout for the Bitties sounds wonderful. Could this also be done for the Twins? --Nethilia 15:08, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

HELP
AkailKaze keeps blocking me and deleting my edits she made me cry cause i can't get on the site anymore!!! :P NOTE I JUST LOOKED AT THE RULES TODAY I DID NOT KNOW WHERE THEY WERE ON THE SITE!! I think you should delete her she's just a mean old lady siting in front of a computer screen making little girls sad she needs to be deleted!!! :( :P 71.108.236.250 21:01, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Complaining from one admin to another is not going to help your case. And yes, I DO make little girls cry because I don't like people who can't read or follow the rules.


 * The rules can be found on the front page. In case you're too lazy, you can read it here: American Girl Dolls Wiki:AG Wiki Rules. This wiki is intended to be a serious project, and if you can't be a big girl (read the rules, it's the third one down) and follow the rules, then maybe this site isn't for you. --AkaiKaze 21:25, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * I am sorry akailkaze i just did not understand why you keep deleting my edits but i did not know you leave a comment why. we all make mistakes! :) 71.108.236.250 00:35, August 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * I am sorry akailkaze i just did not understand why you keep deleting my edits but i did not know you leave a comment why. we all make mistakes! :) 71.108.236.250 00:35, August 3, 2011 (UTC)

I Am sorry. register problems.
Hello i am sorry for my immature behavior i just sometimes loose it on people. I also have a question i want to register but it say "sorry we are unable to register you at this time". Can you guys please fix it. Thank You and again i am sorry. 71.108.236.250 20:30, August 3, 2011 (UTC)

continuing the starry carrier page?
is it okay if i continue to edit the page you deleted it's the starry carrier. thanks. 71.108.236.250 21:23, August 3, 2011 (UTC)

New Historical Character banner?
I've been thinking about updating the banner on the Historical Characters article, and this is what I've come up with:

Image link as it is 1587x275 px large and I don't want to break Oasis's layout

I did not upload the proposed updated banner to the wiki as I think you should be the one to decide on this. If you feel there could be improvements to it I could send the Photoshop file(s) to your email account if you'd like. --AkaiKaze 21:33, October 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * Look great! About the only thing I'd add is to flip Marie to face the other way, if she's on her own layer, so they all face the same way. --Nethilia 03:22, October 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately I could not separate and edit the original image of Cecile and Marie-Grace - parts of their portraits would overlap one another (ie. MG's arm over Cecile's dress, or Cecile's arm over MG's dress).


 * I did find better images of the two girls sans hats and did some more editing, with the following result:


 * Image link as ginormous image is still ginormous at 1462x275 px


 * If it's to your liking it can be immediately uploaded since I saved it in the same format as the current banner (.jpg). --AkaiKaze 05:57, October 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * Looks marvelous! Upload away! --Nethilia 04:16, October 4, 2011 (UTC)

Year of Release template proposal
Given that AG's released 25 years' worth of items, I thought it'd only be feasible if there was a template/table that provides an easy navigation aid in the Category:Items Released in XXXX category pages.

I've made two different possible templates in the sandbox with some placeholder text to give an idea of how they might look in said category pages. --AkaiKaze 01:01, November 24, 2011 (UTC)

--Looks good! I like the longer version format one better. --Nethilia 08:54, November 27, 2011 (UTC)

Deletion request.
I dunno, but can you delete this image for me? I've just uploaded a better, SVG version of the placeholder images, and it won't make much sense if we still keep this. Blakegripling ph 04:01, December 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Done and done. --Nethilia 06:36, December 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'm also actually planning for a main page navigation image similar to the Mafia and GTA wikis, but I'm not too sure about it.